# Code profiling
# proc.time()
At its simplest, proc.time()
gives the total elapsed CPU time in seconds for the current process. Executing it in the console gives the following type of output:
proc.time()
# user system elapsed
# 284.507 120.397 515029.305
This is particularly useful for benchmarking specific lines of code. For example:
t1 <- proc.time()
fibb <- function (n) {
if (n < 3) {
return(c(0,1)[n])
} else {
return(fibb(n - 2) + fibb(n -1))
}
}
print("Time one")
print(proc.time() - t1)
t2 <- proc.time()
fibb(30)
print("Time two")
print(proc.time() - t2)
This gives the following output:
source('~/.active-rstudio-document')
# [1] "Time one"
# user system elapsed
# 0 0 0
# [1] "Time two"
# user system elapsed
# 1.534 0.012 1.572
system.time()
is a wrapper for proc.time()
that returns the elapsed time for a particular command/expression.
print(t1 <- system.time(replicate(1000,12^2)))
## user system elapsed
## 0.000 0.000 0.002
Note that the returned object, of class proc.time
, is slightly more complicated than it appears on the surface:
str(t1)
## Class 'proc_time' Named num [1:5] 0 0 0.002 0 0
## ..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:5] "user.self" "sys.self" "elapsed" "user.child" ...
# Microbenchmark
Microbenchmark is useful for estimating the time taking for otherwise fast procedures. For example, consider estimating the time taken to print hello world.
system.time(print("hello world"))
# [1] "hello world"
# user system elapsed
# 0 0 0
This is because system.time
is essentially a wrapper function for proc.time
, which measures in seconds. As printing "hello world" takes less than a second it appears that the time taken is less than a second, however this is not true. To see this we can use the package microbenchmark:
library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(print("hello world"))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# print("hello world") 26.336 29.984 44.11637 44.6835 45.415 158.824 100
Here we can see after running print("hello world")
100 times, the average time taken was in fact 44 microseconds. (Note that running this code will print "hello world" 100 times onto the console.)
We can compare this against an equivalent procedure, cat("hello world\n")
, to see if it is faster than print("hello world")
:
microbenchmark(cat("hello world\n"))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# cat("hello world\\n") 14.093 17.6975 23.73829 19.319 20.996 119.382 100
In this case cat()
is almost twice as fast as print()
.
Alternatively one can compare two procedures within the same microbenchmark
call:
microbenchmark(print("hello world"), cat("hello world\n"))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# print("hello world") 29.122 31.654 39.64255 34.5275 38.852 192.779 100
# cat("hello world\\n") 9.381 12.356 13.83820 12.9930 13.715 52.564 100
# Benchmarking using microbenchmark
You can use the microbenchmark
(opens new window) package to conduct "sub-millisecond accurate timing of expression evaluation".
In this example (opens new window) we are comparing the speeds of six equivalent data.table
expressions for updating elements in a group, based on a certain condition.
More specifically:
A data.table
with 3 columns: id
, time
and status
. For each id, I want to find the record with the maximum time - then if for that record if the status is true, I want to set it to false if the time is > 7
library(microbenchmark)
library(data.table)
set.seed(20160723)
dt <- data.table(id = c(rep(seq(1:10000), each = 10)),
time = c(rep(seq(1:10000), 10)),
status = c(sample(c(TRUE, FALSE), 10000*10, replace = TRUE)))
setkey(dt, id, time) ## create copies of the data so the 'updates-by-reference' don't affect other expressions
dt1 <- copy(dt)
dt2 <- copy(dt)
dt3 <- copy(dt)
dt4 <- copy(dt)
dt5 <- copy(dt)
dt6 <- copy(dt)
microbenchmark(
expression_1 = {
dt1[ dt1[order(time), .I[.N], by = id]$V1, status := status * time < 7 ]
},
expression_2 = {
dt2[,status := c(.SD[-.N, status], .SD[.N, status * time > 7]), by = id]
},
expression_3 = {
dt3[dt3[,.N, by = id][,cumsum(N)], status := status * time > 7]
},
expression_4 = {
y <- dt4[,.SD[.N],by=id]
dt4[y, status := status & time > 7]
},
expression_5 = {
y <- dt5[, .SD[.N, .(time, status)], by = id][time > 7 & status]
dt5[y, status := FALSE]
},
expression_6 = {
dt6[ dt6[, .I == .I[which.max(time)], by = id]$V1 & time > 7, status := FALSE]
},
times = 10L ## specify the number of times each expression is evaluated
)
# Unit: milliseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# expression_1 11.646149 13.201670 16.808399 15.643384 18.78640 26.321346 10
# expression_2 8051.898126 8777.016935 9238.323459 8979.553856 9281.93377 12610.869058 10
# expression_3 3.208773 3.385841 4.207903 4.089515 4.70146 5.654702 10
# expression_4 15.758441 16.247833 20.677038 19.028982 21.04170 36.373153 10
# expression_5 7552.970295 8051.080753 8702.064620 8861.608629 9308.62842 9722.234921 10
# expression_6 18.403105 18.812785 22.427984 21.966764 24.66930 28.607064 10
The output shows that in this test expression_3
is the fastest.
References
data.table - Adding and modifying columns (opens new window)
data.table - special grouping symbols in data.table (opens new window)
# System.time
System time gives you the CPU time required to execute a R expression, for example:
system.time(print("hello world"))
# [1] "hello world"
# user system elapsed
# 0 0 0
You can add larger pieces of code through use of braces:
system.time({
library(numbers)
Primes(1,10^5)
})
Or use it to test functions:
fibb <- function (n) {
if (n < 3) {
return(c(0,1)[n])
} else {
return(fibb(n - 2) + fibb(n -1))
}
}
system.time(fibb(30))
# Line Profiling
One package for line profiling is lineprof (opens new window) which is written and maintained by Hadley Wickham. Here is a quick demonstration of how it works with auto.arima
in the forecast package:
library(lineprof)
library(forecast)
l <- lineprof(auto.arima(AirPassengers))
shine(l)
This will provide you with a shiny app, which allows you to delve deeper into every function call. This enables you to see with ease what is causing your R code to slow down. There is a screenshot of the shiny app below: