# UNION / UNION ALL
# Basic UNION ALL query
CREATE TABLE HR_EMPLOYEES ( PersonID int, LastName VARCHAR(30), FirstName VARCHAR(30), Position VARCHAR(30) ); CREATE TABLE FINANCE_EMPLOYEES ( PersonID INT, LastName VARCHAR(30), FirstName VARCHAR(30), Position VARCHAR(30) );
Let's say we want to extract the names of all the
managers from our departments.
UNION we can get all the employees from both HR and Finance departments, which hold the
position of a
SELECT FirstName, LastName FROM HR_EMPLOYEES WHERE Position = 'manager' UNION ALL SELECT FirstName, LastName FROM FINANCE_EMPLOYEES WHERE Position = 'manager'
UNION statement removes duplicate rows from the query results. Since it is possible to have people having the same Name and position in both departments we are using
UNION ALL, in order not to remove duplicates.
If you want to use an alias for each output column, you can just put them in the first select statement, as follows:
SELECT FirstName as 'First Name', LastName as 'Last Name' FROM HR_EMPLOYEES WHERE Position = 'manager' UNION ALL SELECT FirstName, LastName FROM FINANCE_EMPLOYEES WHERE Position = 'manager'
# Simple explanation and Example
In simple terms:
UNIONjoins 2 result sets while removing duplicates from the result set
UNION ALLjoins 2 result sets without attempting to remove duplicates
One mistake many people make is to use a
UNION when they do not need to have the duplicates removed. The additional performance cost against large results sets can be very significant.
When you might need
Suppose you need to filter a table against 2 different attributes, and you have created separate non-clustered indexes for each column. A
UNION enables you to leverage both indexes while still preventing duplicates.
SELECT C1, C2, C3 FROM Table1 WHERE C1 = @Param1 UNION SELECT C1, C2, C3 FROM Table1 WHERE C2 = @Param2
This simplifies your performance tuning since only simple indexes are needed to perform these queries optimally. You may even be able to get by with quite a bit fewer non-clustered indexes improving overall write performance against the source table as well.
When you might need
Suppose you still need to filter a table against 2 attributes, but you do not need to filter duplicate records (either because it doesn't matter or your data wouldn't produce any duplicates during the union due to your data model design).
SELECT C1 FROM Table1 UNION ALL SELECT C1 FROM Table2
This is especially useful when creating Views that join data that is designed to be physically partitioned across multiple tables (maybe for performance reasons, but still wants to roll-up records). Since the data is already split, having the database engine remove duplicates adds no value and just adds additional processing time to the queries.
**UNION | UNION ALL**
SELECT column_1 [, column_2 ] FROM table_1 [, table_2 ] [WHERE condition]
UNION ALL clauses combine the result-set of two or more identically structured SELECT statements into a single result / table.
Both the column count and column types for each query have to match in order for a
UNION ALL to work.
The difference between a
UNION and a
UNION ALL query is that the
UNION clause will remove any duplicate rows in the result where the
UNION ALL will not.
This distinct removal of records can significantly slow queries even if there are no distinct rows to be removed because of this if you know there wont be any duplicates (or don't care) always default to
UNION ALL for a more optimised query.