# Comparable and Comparator

# Sorting a List using Comparable or a Comparator

Say we are working on a class representing a Person by their first and last names. We have created a basic class to do this and implemented proper equals and hashCode methods.

public class Person {

    private final String lastName; //invariant - nonnull
    private final String firstName; //invariant - nonnull

    public Person(String firstName, String lastName){
        this.firstName = firstName != null ? firstName : "";
        this.lastName = lastName != null ? lastName : "";
    }

    public String getFirstName() {
        return firstName;
    }

    public String getLastName() {
        return lastName;
    }

    public String toString() {
        return lastName + ", " + firstName;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if (! (o instanceof Person)) return false;
        Person p = (Person)o;
        return firstName.equals(p.firstName) && lastName.equals(p.lastName);
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return Objects.hash(firstName, lastName);
    }
}

Now we would like to sort a list of Person objects by their name, such as in the following scenario:

public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<Person> people = Arrays.asList(new Person("John", "Doe"),
                                     new Person("Bob", "Dole"),
                                     new Person("Ronald", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Alice", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Jill", "Doe"));
    Collections.sort(people); //This currently won't work.
}

Unfortunately, as marked, the above currently won't compile. Collections.sort(..) only knows how to sort a list if the elements in that list are comparable, or a custom method of comparison is given.

If you were asked to sort the following list : 1,3,5,4,2, you'd have no problem saying the answer is 1,2,3,4,5. This is because Integers (both in Java and mathematically) have a natural ordering, a standard, default comparison base ordering. To give our Person class a natural ordering, we implement Comparable<Person>, which requires implementing the method compareTo(Person p):

public class Person implements Comparable<Person> {

    private final String lastName; //invariant - nonnull
    private final String firstName; //invariant - nonnull

    public Person(String firstName, String lastName) {
        this.firstName = firstName != null ? firstName : "";
        this.lastName = lastName != null ? lastName : "";
    }

    public String getFirstName() {
        return firstName;
    }

    public String getLastName() {
        return lastName;
    }

    public String toString() {
        return lastName + ", " + firstName;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if (! (o instanceof Person)) return false;
        Person p = (Person)o;
        return firstName.equals(p.firstName) && lastName.equals(p.lastName);
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return Objects.hash(firstName, lastName);
    }

    @Override
    public int compareTo(Person other) {
        // If this' lastName and other's lastName are not comparably equivalent,
        // Compare this to other by comparing their last names.
        // Otherwise, compare this to other by comparing their first names
        int lastNameCompare = lastName.compareTo(other.lastName);
        if (lastNameCompare != 0) {
            return lastNameCompare;
        } else {
            return firstName.compareTo(other.firstName);
        }
    }
}

Now, the main method given will function correctly

public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<Person> people = Arrays.asList(new Person("John", "Doe"),
                                     new Person("Bob", "Dole"),
                                     new Person("Ronald", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Alice", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Jill", "Doe"));
    Collections.sort(people); //Now functions correctly

    //people is now sorted by last name, then first name:
    // --> Jill Doe, John Doe, Bob Dole, Alice McDonald, Ronald McDonald
}

If, however, you either do not want or are unable to modify class Person, you can provide a custom Comparator<T> that handles the comparison of any two Person objects. If you were asked to sort the following list: circle, square, rectangle, triangle, hexagon you could not, but if you were asked to sort that list based on the number of corners, you could. Just so, providing a comparator instructs Java how to compare two normally not comparable objects.

public class PersonComparator implements Comparator<Person> {

    public int compare(Person p1, Person p2) {
        // If p1's lastName and p2's lastName are not comparably equivalent,
        // Compare p1 to p2 by comparing their last names.
        // Otherwise, compare p1 to p2 by comparing their first names
        if (p1.getLastName().compareTo(p2.getLastName()) != 0) {
            return p1.getLastName().compareTo(p2.getLastName());
        } else {
            return p1.getFirstName().compareTo(p2.getFirstName());
        }
    }
}

//Assume the first version of Person (that does not implement Comparable) is used here
public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<Person> people = Arrays.asList(new Person("John", "Doe"),
                                     new Person("Bob", "Dole"),
                                     new Person("Ronald", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Alice", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Jill", "Doe"));
    Collections.sort(people); //Illegal, Person doesn't implement Comparable.
    Collections.sort(people, new PersonComparator()); //Legal

    //people is now sorted by last name, then first name:
    // --> Jill Doe, John Doe, Bob Dole, Alice McDonald, Ronald McDonald
}

Comparators can also be created/used as an anonymous inner class

//Assume the first version of Person (that does not implement Comparable) is used here
public static void main(String[] args) {
    List<Person> people = Arrays.asList(new Person("John", "Doe"),
                                     new Person("Bob", "Dole"),
                                     new Person("Ronald", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Alice", "McDonald"),
                                     new Person("Jill", "Doe"));
    Collections.sort(people); //Illegal, Person doesn't implement Comparable.

    Collections.sort(people, new PersonComparator()); //Legal

    //people is now sorted by last name, then first name:
    // --> Jill Doe, John Doe, Bob Dole, Alice McDonald, Ronald McDonald

    //Anonymous Class
    Collections.sort(people, new Comparator<Person>() { //Legal
        public int compare(Person p1, Person p2) {
            //Method code...
        }
    });
}

# Lambda expression based comparators

As of Java 8, comparators can also be expressed as lambda expressions


   //Lambda
    Collections.sort(people, (p1, p2) -> { //Legal
        //Method code....
    });

# Comparator default methods

Furthermore, there are interesting default methods on the Comparator interface for building comparators : the following builds a comparator comparing by lastName and then firstName.

Collections.sort(people, Comparator.comparing(Person::getLastName)
                                .thenComparing(Person::getFirstName));

# Inversing the order of a comparator

Any comparator can also easily be reversed using the reversedMethod which will change ascending order to descending.

# The compareTo and compare Methods

The Comparable<T> interface requires one method:

public interface Comparable<T> {

    public int compareTo(T other);

}

And the Comparator<T> interface requires one method:

public interface Comparator<T> {

    public int compare(T t1, T t2);

}

These two methods do essentially the same thing, with one minor difference: compareTo compares this to other, whereas compare compares t1 to t2, not caring at all about this.

Aside from that difference, the two methods have similar requirements. Specifically (for compareTo), Compares this object with the specified object for order. Returns a negative integer, zero, or a positive integer as this object is less than, equal to, or greater than the specified object. (opens new window) Thus, for the comparison of a and b:

  • If a < b, a.compareTo(b) and compare(a,b) should return a negative integer, and b.compareTo(a) and compare(b,a) should return a positive integer
  • If a > b, a.compareTo(b) and compare(a,b) should return a positive integer, and b.compareTo(a) and compare(b,a) should return a negative integer
  • If a equals b for comparison, all comparisons should return 0.

# Natural (comparable) vs explicit (comparator) sorting

There are two Collections.sort() methods:

  • One that takes a `List` as a parameter where `T` must implement Comparable and override the `compareTo()` method that determines sort order.
  • One that takes a List and a Comparator as the arguments, where the Comparator determines the sort order.
  • First, here is a Person class that implements Comparable:

    public class Person implements Comparable<Person> {         
        private String name;  
        private int age;
    
        public String getName() {
            return name;
        }
        public void setName(String name) {
            this.name = name;
        }
        public int getAge() {
            return age;
        }
        public void setAge(int age) {
            this.age = age;
        }         
    
        @Override
        public int compareTo(Person o) {
            return this.getAge() - o.getAge();
        }
        @Override
        public String toString() {
            return this.getAge()+"-"+this.getName();
        }
    
    }
    
    

    Here is how you would use the above class to sort a List in the natural ordering of its elements, defined by the compareTo() method override:

    //-- usage
    List<Person> pList = new ArrayList<Person>();
                Person p = new Person();
                p.setName("A");
                p.setAge(10);
                pList.add(p);
                p = new Person();
                p.setName("Z");
                p.setAge(20);
                pList.add(p);
                p = new Person();
                p.setName("D");
                p.setAge(30);
                pList.add(p);
                
                //-- natural sorting i.e comes with object implementation, by age
                Collections.sort(pList);
    
                System.out.println(pList);
    
    

    Here is how you would use an anonymous inline Comparator to sort a List that does not implement Comparable, or in this case, to sort a List in an order other than the natural ordering:

    
               //-- explicit sorting, define sort on another property here goes with name
                Collections.sort(pList, new Comparator<Person>() {
    
                    @Override
                    public int compare(Person o1, Person o2) {
                        return o1.getName().compareTo(o2.getName());
                    }
                });            
                System.out.println(pList);
    
    

    # Creating a Comparator using comparing method

    Comparator.comparing(Person::getName)
    
    

    This creates a comparator for the class Person that uses this person name as the comparison source. Also it is possible to use method version to compare long, int and double. For example:

    Comparator.comparingInt(Person::getAge)
    
    

    Reversed order

    To create a comparator that imposes the reverse ordering use reversed() method:

    Comparator.comparing(Person::getName).reversed()
    
    

    Chain of comparators

    Comparator.comparing(Person::getLastName).thenComparing(Person::getFirstName)
    
    

    This will create a comparator that firs compares with last name then compares with first name. You can chain as many comparators as you want.

    # Sorting Map entries

    As of Java 8, there are default methods on the Map.Entry interface to allow sorting of map iterations.

    Map<String, Integer> numberOfEmployees = new HashMap<>();
    numberOfEmployees.put("executives", 10);
    numberOfEmployees.put("human ressources", 32);
    numberOfEmployees.put("accounting", 12);
    numberOfEmployees.put("IT", 100);
    
    // Output the smallest departement in terms of number of employees
    numberOfEmployees.entrySet().stream()
        .sorted(Map.Entry.comparingByValue())
        .limit(1)
        .forEach(System.out::println);   // outputs : executives=10
    
    

    Of course, these can also be used outside of the stream api :

    List<Map.Entry<String, Integer>> entries = new ArrayList<>(numberOfEmployees.entrySet());
    Collections.sort(entries, Map.Entry.comparingByValue());
    
    

    # Syntax

    • public class MyClass implements Comparable<MyClass>
    • public class MyComparator implements Comparator<SomeOtherClass>
    • public int compareTo(MyClass other)
    • public int compare(SomeOtherClass o1, SomeOtherClass o2)

    # Remarks

    When implementing a compareTo(..) method which depends upon a double, do not do the following:

    public int comareTo(MyClass other) {
        return (int)(doubleField - other.doubleField); //THIS IS BAD
    }
    
    

    The truncation caused by the (int) cast will cause the method to sometimes incorrectly return 0 instead of a positive or negative number, and can thus lead to comparison and sorting bugs.

    Instead, the simplest correct implementation is to use Double.compare (opens new window), as such:

    public int comareTo(MyClass other) {
        return Double.compare(doubleField,other.doubleField); //THIS IS GOOD
    } 
    
    

    A non-generic version of Comparable<T>, simply Comparable, has existed since Java 1.2 (opens new window). Other than for interfacing with legacy code, it's always better to implement the generic version Comparable<T>, as it doesn't require casting upon comparison.

    It is very standard for a class to be comparable to itself, as in:

    public class A implements Comparable<A>
    
    

    While it is possible to break from this paradigm, be cautious when doing so.

    A Comparator<T> can still be used on instances of a class if that class implements Comparable<T>. In this case, the Comparator's logic will be used; the natural ordering specified by the Comparable implementation will be ignored.